Clayface Review

 

Alright, it's another installment of the DC Universe. Will this one be better than the previous entires?

Clayface is a body horror thriller that's based on the DC Comics' villain of the same name. It also serves as the third film entry of the DC Universe (DCU). It's produced by DC Studios, 6th & Idaho, Troll Court Entertainment, and The Safran Company with Warner Bros. Pictures as the distributor. Mike Flanagan and Hossein Amini wrote the story while James Watkins directed.

The story is, after his face was disfigured by crime lord Markos Szabo and Szabo also furthers ruins his life by paying people to spread false allegations, actor Matt Hagan feels as though there's nothing left to live for. But this changes when he finds out about Dr. Caitlyn Corr's nanites that can repair damaged tissue and skin. The more and more Matt takes these nanites the more he can shape shift his body, but the treatment also drives Matt mad with vengeance and insanity.

Initial Reaction

Honestly I didn't have any high expectations for this movie. So far the DCU has been a disaster. Everyone has forgotten about Creature Commandos so that should tell you the impact that show had, Superman was decent at best, Supergirl was bad, and Lanterns was the worst show I've seen since Velma. So I really didn't have any faith in this movie despite some good trailers.

Cons

I've got nothing.

Middle Ground

The biggest gray area is the story. First, let me tell you about the good stuff. I truly liked Matt's decent into murderous insanity. It had nice development. First we meet him as an actor who's on top of the world, we see his fall, and by the time it's over he's a full-blown villain and your sympathy for him is gone just like his mind. That was good storytelling. Then we have the other stuff. Other Dr. Corr, who does have a pretty decent story involving her fear that her nanites are dangerous, she also has a good romance story with Matt. But all of the other characters don't get much developed. Sure not every single one should, but they could've given them more memorable personalities. Which none of them do. There's also the fact the revenge/horror elements don't do anything to standout. I mean I was still entertained. Hell, some of the body horror stuff was pretty good. One moment that comes to mind is when Matt has an episode and his eyelids have morphed and had fused together, which makes Matt have to cut them open while the plane he's on is shaking because of the turbulence. That was a truly disturbing moment. But all of the moments whether it's horror or revenge can some familiarity.

Pros

One bit of praise goes to the effects. Especially the practical ones. Matt's disfigured face looks incredible. The makeup on that was perfect. There's also some good GCI when it comes to Matt's shape shifting. And both those elements really added to the body horror side of the movie. But the biggest praise should absolutely go to Tom Rhys Harries' performance. I've never seen this guy in anything before but left a great impression. His range is everywhere. He nailed being charming, devastated, vulnerable, and unhinged. If he doesn't get more starring roles after this it'll be Hollywood's lose.

Clayface was actually a fun experience. While the story has some good aspects in it, it doesn't really break new ground. It's certainly better than previous DCU film entries but in hindsight that's not really saying much.

My final rating is, Good.

That's all for now. Due come back on Monday, Oct 26th, for my review of something I recently discovered called, WNUF Halloween Special. Until then, enjoy the rest of your day.

Classic Film Night - American Psycho

 

It's another Classic Film Night review but this time it's once again getting into the Halloween season.

American Psycho is a horror comedy based on Bret Easton Ellis' 1991 novel of the same name. Production was Edward R. Pressman Productions and Muse Productions with Lions Gate Films being the distributor. Mary Harron not only directed by also wrote the screenplay with Guinevere Turner.

The story is, it's 1987 and a New York City investment banker Patrick Bateman has a very polished appearance. He dines at trendy restaurants, has a beautiful apartment, stays in shape, and his friends are as wealthy as he is. But this is all just a façade to hide his deep violent impulses. At first Patrick is able to maintain this demeanor, but soon status envy slowly eats away at him and he starts killing people whether they're homeless, co-workers, or romantic partners.

My Thoughts

One thing that's masterfully done is Mary Harron's directing. Her style is cool, controlled, and sleek. So gives the film an almost glossy look while still showing more darker elements as well. It's kinda like Patrick Bateman. Stylish on the outside, but dark on the inside.

Speaking of Patrick Bateman or in this case the actor who plays him, Christian Bale. Bale's performance is incredible. It's no wonder other than Batman, this is one of his more iconic roles. Bale was fully committed to this role. He absolutely nails being charming one moment, then insane the next. It was entertaining seeing him speak in analytical manner about Huey Lewis and the News' song "Hip to be Square" and then go fully insane and kill someone with an axe. Bale's acting alone is a great reason to watch this movie.

Then there's the dark comedy. There's plenty of truly funny moments. One of my favorites is when Patrick tries to kill a guy in the bathroom, but instead of the guy thinking it's attempted murder he thinks it's Patrick being kinky towards him. That part was absolutely hilarious. Ah the good old days of gay jokes without the filmmakers worrying if somebody is gonna be offended afterwards. Good times. 😆

The last thing I'll praise is the story. Not only does it have a pretty good satire yuppie culture, but it also has a great story of a guy who's losing his mind. But what's so brilliant about the story is because Patrick is such an unreliable narrator, the story cleverly makes you second guess of what events are reliable. Because of people to this day still debate and theorize about Patrick and the story.

You definitely need to give American Psycho a watch. It's horror elements aren't so much about violence even though that's present, but more about how unstable Patrick is. Regardless, it's still a brilliantly made film.

My final rating is, A Must Watch!

I'm all done here. Come back on Saturday, Oct 24th, for my review of the newest DC Universe movie, Clayface. Until then, enjoy the rest of your day.

Fan Film Mondays - Halloween Knight Review

It's another Fan Film Mondays. Much like last year, I reviewed a fan film based on an iconic horror franchise. Only that was Friday the 13th, and this time I around we see what happens when Michael Myers and Batman collide.

Halloween Knight is a 2025 fan film based on both the Halloween franchise and the DC Comics' character Batman. It's produced by No Joke Entertainment and was directed by Nicholas Joel Kranick who also wrote the story with R.W. Martin and Adam Parrott.

The story is, it's been 40 years since Michael Myers terrorized innocent people in Haddonfield on Halloween in 1978. The institution that was holding him was shut down and he was scheduled to be transferred to Arkham Asylum, but Michael escaped and his now heading towards Gotham City. However, unlike Haddonfield, Gotham has a dark protector who isn't afraid to go after the purely evil masked killer. That protector being none other than the Dark Knight himself, Batman.

• Negatives

I've got nothing.

• Mix

If there's one thing to slightly criticize but not too harshly it's the fact the movie isn't all that polished. Acting ranges from serviceable or better than you think. Costumes are decent enough. Sometimes the lighting isn't all that consistent, other times it's good other times only slightly decent. The point is there's clearly people capable of working the filmmaking equipment, they just need to keep practicing. But again I'm not gonna be too much of dick to Nicholas and his film. Because 1) It's a fan film and nobody was expecting prime Hollywood material. 2) This was his very first fan film. And everyone's first movie can be rough, fan film or otherwise. And 3) It's very obvious they were working on a tight budget. I think it was estimated this was made for like $15,000. So if Nicholas ever makes a sequel or another fan film, hopefully he'll have more of a budget and his filmmaking skills improved.

• Positives

One positive is the music. While the film may needed some work here and there, I can't say the same thing for the music. The main title music alone sounded like it'd hear from an actual officially licensed movie.

Another good aspect is the fact this was made by passionate fans. First there's plenty of easter eggs. There's a car scene involving an abusive pimp that's clearly taken from The Dark Knight Returns, the Batwave from the 2004 animated series The Batman makes an appearance, some teenage punks are listening to Rob Zombie's song I'm Your Boogieman, which is a nod to the fact Rob Zombie was the director for the remakes of Halloween & Halloween II, and Silver Shamrock masks from Halloween III: Season of the Witch are worn by said teen punks and the Silver Shamrock Halloween jingle can be heard in the background. But other than easter eggs, there's the story. Not only is Batman vs. Michael Myers something I'd expect to here from fan debate, but the writing respects both properties. Michael Myers isn't treated as a joke or some easy obstacle for Batman. He's treated as that purely evil killing machine with no clear motivation for why he's killing people. Meanwhile Batman is written as a detective and hero trying to stop a madman.

So overall a pretty decent fan film. If that sequel does become a thing then I wish Nicholas and his crew the best of luck. If you want to this out go right ahead, but heads up. This is fifty-seven minutes long so watch if you have the time.

My final rating is, a low Good.

That's all for now. Come back on Thursday, Oct 22nd, for my Classic Film Night review of, American Psycho. Until then, enjoy the rest of your day.

Street Fighter (2026) Review

 

We got a brand new live-action Street Fighter movie. Will this be the first ever good one or is it gonna be a stinker?

Street Fighter (2026) is a martial arts film based on the iconic Capcom video game series of the same name, and the third live-action adaptation. It's produced by Legendary Pictures with Paramount Pictures acting as thr distributor. Kitao Sakurai directed and wrote the screenplay with T.J. Fixman, while the story was written by Dalan Musson and Gary Dauberman.

The story is, Chun-Li has searched and found both Ryu & Ken and recruits them to the second World Warrior tournament. But what the two don't know is the tournament is a set up by the evil dictator M. Bison so he can steal Ryu's powers.

Initial Reaction

Originally I was skeptical about this movie. The last two Street Fighter movies weren't exactly something to write home about. Then I saw the trailers for this and it seemed like it could be some fun popcorn entertainment. So I decided to give this one its fighting chance.

Cons

The only thing I didn't like about the movie was the humor. I laughed like once throughout the entire movie, everything else was either meh or just plain bad. It doesn't help that at one point the filmmakers want this to be serious then a couple scenes later wants to be funny. I mean it'll give the humor some credit, it didn't go for meta jokes. I think the closest we got was Cammy talking about people loving Chun-Li's thighs and not seeing the big deal. But that was more smack talk than a joke.

Middle Ground

The biggest mix bag is the story. Characters such as Ryu, Ken, and Chun-Li all have stories that's about regret, not feeling good enough, and revenge. So they got some sort of development going on. The rest of the characters not so much. M. Bison is just doing standard villain stuff, which can be kinda fun but nothing that's really gonna blow you away. But all of the other characters such as Guile, Vega, Cammy, etc. are barely used or might as well have been cameos. Now don't get the wrong idea I wasn't expecting every single character to have a deeper story, but if you're gonna use some fan favorites at least give them bigger supporting roles instead of they're here one moment, gone the next, and pop up later. But the biggest letdown was the tournament. Despite being the main reason why a majority of our characters are here it's not used very much. We get maybe two or three tournament fights while the others happen off-screen or a character forfeits with no dramatic tension whatsoever.

Pros

The biggest praise I can give this is, it actually looks and feels like a Street Fighter! The movie doesn't shy away from more fantastical elements of the source material. We get their fighting styles, their special attacks, and the actors and actresses actually look like the characters. This isn't the '94 movie, where the fantastical elements are barely there. And it isn't like Legend of Chun-Li, where the filmmakers are trying to make everything grounded. The movie fully embraces what makes Street Fighter, Street Fighter.

This is deeply flawed video game movie, but at the same time it wasn't terrible or boring.

My final rating is, a low Okay.

That'll wrap things up. Come back on Monday, Oct 19th, for a more spooky edition of Fan Films Mondays. Until then, enjoy the rest of your day.

The Host (2006) Review

 

Monday I reviewed the movie Dog Soldiers, a movie that was made outside of the United States. But after I finished that movie I realized I haven't reviewed a non-English movie since The Raid back in 2024. So to fix that I go from Britain to South Korea with a horror flick I've heard about many times but never got around to watching until now. Oh and if you're wonder why I put the year the movie was released is because I didn't want any confusing with that crappy 2013 film with the same name.

The Host is a South Korean monster movie that was produced by Chungeorahm Film and distributed by Showbox. Bong Joon Ho directed and wrote the screenplay along with Ha Joon-won and Baek Chul-hyun.

The story is, in 2000 an American pathologist ordered his Korean assistant to dump hundreds of bottles of formaldehyde down a drain which finds its way to the Han River. Six years later, a mutant monster born from that action is causing havoc and killing people. Caught up in this madness is a family who must find a way to survive this monster and a supposed virus it carries.

• Negatives

The only true negative I can is the CGI. Now design wise the monster looks great. It's a very ugly monster and has a lot of amphibian traits. But the CGI for this thing isn't good plain and simple.

• Mix

I've got nothing.

• Positives

One praise I'll give is the surprising tonal balance. The movie's tone can range from horror to drama to action and comedy. And it's all balance to a great degree. The drama of the dysfunctional actual works instead of cheap tag on. The horror has some good tense, and there were some funny moments that got a laugh out of me. But not only is the tone balanced but because it's so well executed it gives the movie a very unpredictable edge.

Now Joon Ho, Joon-won, and Chul-hyun do dive into social satire by not only taking influence from an actual waste dumping scandal (the McFarland incident) but by dividing into things such as government incompetence, media hysteria, etc. Now unlike today's satire where it's clear the woke writer is playing favorites, Joon Ho and company actually do a good job on their satire because he along with his fellow writers critiqued both the incompetence of the American and Korean government. Because of this not playing favorites attitude you can something that's actually entertaining instead of preachy.

The last praise I'll give is Song Kang-ho's performance for his role as Park Gang-du. His character is a slow-witted clumsy misfit but is also shown to be a caring father. Kang-ho captures both the character's comedic side but he also anchors the film emotionally as well. And when two very big and sad events happen to Park you're actually hoping the guy wins in the end, and that's in part thanks to Kang-ho's performance.

While the CGI isn't good, there's a lot of other aspects to love about The Host.

My final rating is, Good.

That's all for now. Come back on Saturday, Oct 17th, for my review of the newest live-action Street Fighter movie. Until then, enjoy the rest of your day.

Underrated Films - Dog Soldiers Review

Alright, we continue the season of spooky with a brand new Underrated Films review.

Dog Soldiers is a British action horror movie that was produced by Kismet Entertainment Group, The Noel Gay Motion Picture Company, Victor Film Company, and Carousel Picture Company with Pathé distributing. Neil Marshall both wrote and directed.

The story is, a squad of British soldiers are into a remote area of the Scottish Highlands to carry out a training exercise against a Special Air Service unit. After the training is over, the soldiers soon find the torn apart remains of the SAS unit. They quickly realize they're being hunted by a pack of werewolves. The soldiers only hope is to fight back and survive until the sun rises.

Why It's Underrated

It's a tale as old as time, a great film that just doesn't get enough attention. I haven't seen a TV showing for this film in years. The last time I remember that is back in I believe 2005 when I was channel surfing and I stumbled upon this film on SciFi (although now it's spelled SyFy). But I can't recall this movie ever getting more showings pass the 2000's on TV or a brand new DVD/Blu-Ray release.

My Thoughts

Now before I start praising this movie let's get something out of the way first. Dog Soldiers doesn't do anything really new in horror or more specifically the werewolf genre. However! The entertainment factor with this is off the charts. Whether it's the intense action, so moments that actually are scary, or those bits of dark comedy, the movie is never ever boring. So despite hitting some familiar beats you'll recognize from other films, there's never a dull moment.

With that slight criticism out of the way let's start the praising. One great thing is the casts' chemistry. These guys actually do feel like soldiers who've been with each other for a long time. Whether they're trash talking each other, talking about football, or telling stories of soldiers they knew but are sadly no longer alive, these guys feel like they have a brotherhood. So when one of them do die it actually does sting quite a lot. So thumbs up to the cast.

There's also the pacing. The movie clocks in at an hour and forty-five minutes but it never felt like that. That whole story beat where the soldiers find the ripped up remains of the SAS happens when you're like twenty-three minutes into the flick. That scene may not be the big main event but the fact we're at the moment where our heroes know something that isn't human killed those men shows that Neil Marshall wasn't wasting everybody's time.

My last praise goes to the special effects, especially on the werewolves. This was released in 2002 thus this movie is twenty-four years old (God that made me feel old typing that) but despite it's age the werewolf effects still hold up. It helps that Marshall chose practical creature effects like costumes and animatronics rather than something made with CGI. Had he gone that route than that really would've shown how low budget the film is, but I digress.

I strongly recommend you all watch Dog Soldiers for your Halloween season. It may hit some familiar territory, but it's a blast to watch.

My final rating is, Great.

That's all for now. Come back on Thursday, Oct 15th, where I'll continue to go outside the United States to find some horror movies to review by giving my thoughts on The Host. Until then, enjoy the rest of your day.

The Social Reckoning & Other Mommy Review

 

That's right I'm doing another double review! But before we get started let me explain a few things. So if you read my review on The Crazies then you were expecting this review on Saturday, yesterday. Well the reason why I didn't upload on Saturday was because two unexpected things happened. First my dad wanted my help with the garden he and my mom have. So I'm throwing dead plants out into the field, cleaning pots, among other things. Then, my grandpa asked for my help moving things around at his place. Now I could've said I'll help me on Sunday and he would've been understanding, but then I would've felt like a dick. So I instead helped him out and just save this double review for later.

The Social Reckoning is a biographical legal thriller that's based on the events of the 2021 Facebook leaks, and a sequel to The Social Network. Production was done by Columbia Pictures and Alcon Entertainment with Sony Pictures being the distributor. Aaron Sorkin both wrote and directed.

The story is, a young Facebook engineer named Frances Haugen has enlisted the help of a Wall Street reporter Jeff Horwitz to blow the whistle on Facebook's most guarded secrets. This event will soon be known as The Facebook Files.

Cons

I've got nothing.

Middle Ground

There are two mix bags, the biggest one being the timing. As we know the hearings happened in 2021, it's now 2026. By this point everyone knows or has an idea of what The Facebook Files are. Having said that it still works as an engagement and watchable film. It's sharp and procedural structure still holds together. But this really should've been released in 2023 or maybe early 2024. That way it could've had the same sense of urgency The Social Network had. There's also the way the movie looks. Now Sorkin as a director keeps things nice clear and focused. But this movie really could've benefited from someone who could match David Fincher's slightly icy visual style that made The Social Network look controlled and a little menacing.

Pros

One good or should I say great aspect is Sorkin's writing and dialogue. His screenplay is a smart and focused on the friction between traditional journalism and tech power. His writing did great highlighting how engagement-driven algorithms are more focused on growth and outrage. Then of course there's his brilliant dialogue. One of the best was "You're like a crossing guard standing in front of a school but you're not doing anything with your arms, so the cars are just plowing down the children". Another good one final thing I'll touch on is the performances. Mikey Madison is the dramatic center. Madison plays Haugen as an introverted data engineer who believes in Facebook's original "connect the world" mission and is shocked to discover the site would much rather prioritize engagement. She does a great job showing Haugen go from quiet idealistic to someone willing to risk everything. Then we have Jeremy Allen White as Jeff Horwitz. White brings out Horwitz feeling of being out of his depth but refuses to look the other way. And his more casual, low-key delivery pairs well with Madison's more intense internal focus.

Overall The Social Reckoning is pretty good. Should've been released sooner but still worth checking out even if you're only gonna do it once.

My final rating is, Good.

Now let's move on to our next movie.

Other Mommy is a supernatural psychological horror movie based on the 2024 novel, Incidents Around the House. It's produced by Blumhouse and Atomic Monster with distribution by Universal Pictures. The writer is Nathan Elston and the director is Rob Savage.

The story is, seven year old Isabela aka Bela has been talking to something who she's named "Other Mommy" because of the entity's resemblance looks exactly like her real mother Ursula. But as Bela's encounters with the supernatural creature become more and more frightening, Ursula along with her husband Russell will do everything they can to protect their daughter from Other Mommy.

Cons

I've got nothing.

Middle Ground

Now there are some effective scares. The opening with Other Mommy contorted underneath the kitchen table is very freaky and terrifying. But then the scares quickly get repetitive. There really needed to be more space between the scary moments. Because after awhile you start to recognize a pattern, and pattern recognition kills dread. Not to mention but the repeated scares also undercuts the dysfunctional family storyline. Other Mommy is clearly meant to be a warped reflection of Ursula's martial strain. But that story never gets its full potential because the filmmakers were far too focused on the next horror scene. So the family story arc only reaches a decent level.

Pros

There's three good things about Other Mommy, one being Jessica Chastian's dual performance. She brought out Other Mommy's twisted smiles and uncanny elements. And when she was the real Ursula she's far more restrained and shows confliction with Ursula's struggles. There's also Arabella Olivia Clark and her performance as Bela. Despite this being her seventh acting job, her showing Bela's fear of both Other Mommy and her realization that her family is broken was great acting. Her along with Chastin really grounded the movie. My last praise will go to the production. This was made with a budget of $19 million dollars and that money was spent very well. The film looks polished and the set pieces looked great.

While I wasn't fully disappointed at Other Mommy, I do think you should just wait for it to go to streaming or rent on a DVD. Some moments can be uneasy and scary, but for the most part you don't gotta rush to see it.

My final rating is, Okay.

That's all for now. Come back tomorrow, Monday, Oct 12th, for my Underrated Films review of Dog Soldiers. Until then, enjoy the rest of your day.