Spider-Man: Brand New Day Review

 

Alright, it's a brand new era for Tom Holland's Spider-Man! Was it as exciting as the trailers or does it suck?

Spider-Man: Brand New Day is a comic book movie based on the iconic Marvel Comics character Spider-Man. It's the 38th film in the Marvel Cinematic Universe, the fourth MCU Spider-Man film, and the overall ninth live-action Spidey film. The movie also takes partial elements from the Brand New Day storyline. Columbia Pictures along with Marvel Studios and Pascal Pictures handled production while Sony Pictures Releasing was the distributor. Chris McKenna and Erik Sommers once again return to write the screenplay, but this time the director isn't Jon Watts but Destin Daniel Cretton.

The story is, it's been four years since the events of No Way Home and the world has not only forgotten Peter Parker is Spider-Man but also forgot he exist. During those years Peter Parker has been anonymously protecting New York and Spider-Man is now a celebrated hero, but Peter is keeping himself distance from the ones he cares about. Things will take a dark turn when not only a new villain appears, but Peter's powers are going through a possibly dangerous mutation.

Initial Reaction

I've been waiting for this movie since No Way Home, cause I've been curious of where Holland's Spider-Man will go next? I got really excited hearing street-level crime and even more excited by the trailers. So hopefully all this hype was real.

Cons

I've got nothing.

Middle Ground

It all stems from the writing. Now the good stuff is Spider-Man is stopping a much smaller crime. Spider-Man: Homecoming also had Spidey doing stopping small crimes but it was mostly him trying to escape that and wanting to join the "big leagues", but with Brand New Day it's small crime through and through. So it was great to see the friendly neighborhood Spider-Man. But what we also got with this movie is we see Holland's Spider-Man really go through it. Sure he lost more family in No Way Home, but here he's always working to keep his mind busy so he doesn't have to think of the people he had to leave, then he finally meets up with again but then later has a breakdown, and that mutation you've been seeing in the trailers and TV spots, that's what the movie called "the spider trying to eat the man". Yeah, Holland's Spidey this time around is going through a lot. Where the story stumbles a bit is it does feel like the movie has the typical MCU obligations. Setups for future movies and humor where it probably didn't need to be. The other mix feeling is Sadie Sink's character. Yeah I'm not telling who she is even if some of you already know. But I digress, I understand why her character or this version of the character is the way she is. Unlike her comic book counterpart she doesn't have the support system she does in the comics. Now Sink's character does slightly redeem herself near the end. So I dig what the writers did with this version, however I think they went a little extreme with the character's actions. I think what it was is the writers wanted to give Sink a big memorable and slightly scary performance that shows her character is a powerful force. But they [McKenna & Sommers] prioritized the scary part a little too hard.

Pros

One pro is the performances especially from Tom Holland and Sadie Sink. It's great to see Holland be able to show more of his range as an actor. Not only does he have good chemistry with Zendaya, but Holland sells the inner turmoil that Peter/Spider-Man is going through. He carries the isolation and grief of the entire movie. Matching that mature weight is Sadie Sink. She was great with her character's fury and vulnerability. I know previously I said the movie's humor felt like an obligation, but I still want to praise a lot of the tone. As far as Holland's solo Spidey films goes, this one so far as a darker tone. Which is refreshing to see especially since a lot of comic book films have studio heads thinking audiences still want lighthearted romps attached to every single comic book character under the sun. The last thing I'll say about Brand New Day is Cretton's directing. There are a lot of great looking shots in this movie. For the longest time it seems like Marvel just wanted a lot of their movies to look like it was directed by the same guy. But I'm happy to see that or at least it seems like Marvel is allowing more of their directors to add a lot of their style to the movies they're directing.

While it has its issues, Spider-Man: Brand New Day is something I wanted from Tom Holland's Spider-Man. More low-level crimes, less tech, little to no mentor figures, etc. Hopefully this'll continue in the next MCU Spider-Man movie.

My final rating is, Good.

That's all for now. Come back on Monday, Aug 3rd, for the return to the Road to Street Fighter (2026). Until then, enjoy the rest of your day.

Spider-Man: Brand New Day (Comic) Review

With Spider-Man: Brand New Day arriving in theaters tomorrow, I thought it'd be a good idea to look at the comic storyline the movie took some, not all, but some ideas from.

Spider-Man: Brand New Day is a 2008 comic book storyline published by Marvel Comics. While the story arc itself took place in issues #546-564 the entire Brand New Day status quo runs from issues #546-647 and it's also accompanied by tie-ins, one-shots, and annuals. Dan Slott wrote issues #546-648 & #559-561, with Marc Guggenheim writing issues #549-551, Bob Gale writing issues #552-554, 558 & 562-563, Zeb Wells writing issues #555-557, and lastly we had Slott, Guggenheim and Gale all writing issue #564. Then we have a lot of artists doing a lot of issues. One of them being Steven McNiven drawing issues #546-548, Salvador Larroca drawing issues #549-551, Phil Jimenez drawing issues #552-554, Chris Bachalo drawing issues #555-557, Barry Kitson drawing issue #558, Marcos Martin drawing issues #559-561, Mike McKone drawing issues #562-563, and lastly Chris Bachalo & Paulo Siqueria both drawing issue #564.

The story is, after the events of One More Day (🖕👎) Peter Parker's life has changed forever. He's never been married to Mary-Jane Watson and his unmasking during Civil War has been altered. Not only that but he's been struggling with getting a new job since the Daily Bugle is struggling with selling papers and J. Jonah Jameson is refusing to sell the Bugle to new owners, not to mention but thanks to the Superhuman Registration Act he hasn't been Spider-Man for quite awhile. But he'll have to step back into action when new villains appear and put people in grave danger.

• Negatives

I've got nothing here, so just move onto the next part.

• Mix

If there's one mixed feeling I had with this storyline it's the writing. As per usual with this section of this review let's get into the good stuff. Now the one part of Brand New Day is to be an accessible jumping-on for newer readers and it does succeed in that. You can pretty much read this arc without too much knowledge of prior events/stories. Not to mention but it was fun to see the writers experiment with new villains. I actually had a bit of enjoyment with Freak, but the more breakout villain is definitely Mister Negative. There's also some fun to be had with the villain Menace even if they're little too much Green Goblin. The story arcs are also much more self-contained so new readers won't feel like they have to do too much homework. Now here's the part where the slight negatives come in. Firstly the shadow of the ever controversial One More Day lingers. It was hard for me to truly get into these otherwise fun stories, but because I know how we got here it's really hard to fully love these comics. There's also the fact that sometimes Peter is out of character. Sure he's not all around perfect, but he still should feel like veteran at the superhero game. Especially since only some aspects of Peter's life and events were slightly altered, this isn't a full blown reboot to the point where he's a rookie.

• Positives

I'll first compliment the pacing. All of these stories were a breeze to get through and never felt like a drag.

My biggest praise goes to the art. Each artists brought their respective strengths for this back-to-basics relaunch. Steve McNiven brought a polished, realistic, and highly detailed style. His art has that cinematic clarity he brought to titles like Civil War. Phil Jimenez was also highly detailed but his figures were more stylized and expressive. Salvador Larroca brought a good balance of dynamics with a strong sense of character acting and action. Then you've got like Barry Kitson with a clean adventure feel and Chris Bachalo with an even more stylized look adding even more visual variety. But the biggest name that became a standout is Marcos Martin. Who's art has been favorable compared to the very first Spider-Man artist Steve Ditko. Which after reading I can see why. Much like Ditko, Martin's style has the classic slinky acrobatic anatomy, expressive hands, and narrower eye lenses on the Spidey mask. But he also compared more modern elements like McFarlane looking "spaghetti webbing" along with pages that have naturalistic yet highly designed flow. And his action sequences have intentive staging and clean motion. Marcos' art has loads of personality.

While I enjoyed some of Brand New Day, it's not in the top five of my favorite Spider-Man stories. Especially with that One More Day cloud over my head when reading despite it being years ago since both of these were released.

My final rating is, Okay.

That's all for now. Come back on Saturday, Aug 1st, for my review of the movie Spider-Man: Brand New Day. Until then, enjoy the rest of your day.

Looking Back at the Films of 2025 Part 7 - Smurfs & War of the Worlds (2025)

 

Well everyone were back at it again. Another installment of the Films of 2025. And this time around the films of yesteryear are really making glad I skipped these two. Well, I'm glad I skipped out on one of them.

Why Didn't I See Smurfs?

Cause I've never been a Smurf fan. I mean sure I saw a couple of episodes on Boomerang, but as far as classic cartoon characters I never got into Smurfs. Tom & Jerry, yes. Looney Tunes, yes. Scooby-Doo, yes. Smurfs...not so much. It also didn't help the marketing for these movie was absolutely dreadful. I mean seriously, "Influencer Smurf"?! Really?!

What is Smurfs?

Smurfs is an animated "musical" (I'll explain later why this is in quotation marks later) comedy based on The Smurfs by Belgian comics artist Peyo and acts as a reboot to the Smurfs film series. Production was done by Paramount Animation and distributed by Paramount Pictures. Pam Brady wrote the screenplay while Chris Miller directed.

The story is, years ago the Intergalactic Evil Wizards Alliance attempted to use four magical books to rule the world but were defeated by Papa Smurf and his brothers, where Papa hid one of the four books away. Now in the present one of the evil wizards and Gargamel's brother Razamel has kidnapped Papa and wants to know where that book is. Meanwhile the Smurfs go on a rescue mission to find and Papa and save the world.

My Thoughts

The Good: The animation was at least good.

The Bad: Where do I begin? Let's start with the voice acting. Firstly Rihanna is terrible as Smurfette. Even if she could emote more with her voice, her voice still wouldn't fit Smurfette's design. Everyone else from John Goodman to Nick Offerman aren't bad but this still isn't there strongest work. They still have some emotions to their voices but it sounded like they were going through the motions. Then we have the humor. I'll admit I laughed two times but those two moments didn't help this movie. Most of the jokes just fall flat or just aren't funny. Then there's the writing. One confusing thing is the Smurfs travel to different locations but for some reason it's live-action yet the Smurfs are still animated. Why? Never explained. There's also this whole thing where Smurfs are guardians against evil to the point they could possibly have to defend the multiverse. I'm not joking, that's actually in this movie. Cause apparently the Smurfs are now on par with DC and Marvel superheroes? Then we also have a generic message about finding who you are and it's not all that interesting. Now about that whole musical thing I think the songs weren't meant to be here, I think they were mandatory. Because not only are they forgettable, but I don't think there's that many? I think maybe there were at most four? So can you really be called a musical when you don't have that many songs? The last thing I'll touch on is how this is supposed to be the improved version. Yeah that whole thing about "Influencer Smurf" and the Poots are their fart gimmick, remember those from the marketing? Well those are all gone. Not that I'm complaining mind you, but what does it say about your movie when even the re-edited version is bad.

The Okay: I've got nothing.

Final Verdict: Bad.

Why Didn't I See War of the Worlds (2025)

Since COVID was over I started go back to theaters more and more I've since almost stopped reviewing streaming movies. Sure I'll do one every once in awhile but for the most part I just don't do them as much as I use to. And because of that decision I'm out of the loop of what's streaming on a lot of these services. So I didn't know about this movie until I saw reviewers like Fanboy Flicks ripping this movie apart on YouTube.

What is War of the Worlds (2025)

War of the Worlds (2025) is a sci-fi film based on H.G. Wells' classic 1898 novel The War of the Worlds. Bazelevs Company and Patrick Aiello Productions produced the move and even though Universal Pictures is the distributor it was released on Amazon Prime Video. Kenneth A. Golde and Marc Hyman wrote the story with Rich Lee directing.

The story is, DHS officer Will Radford was doing his usual job of working for the government's surveillance program by monitoring every person in the United States. Then everything changed when large machines emerged out of meteors and started attacking the entire planet. Will must now help government put a stop to this invasion while at the same time keeping his family safe within the building of the DHS headquarters.

My Thoughts

The Good: This'll make for a great movie night with your friends when you don't want to enjoy, but you want to rip one apart like Mystery Science Theater 3000.

The Bad: Let's start off with our main character Will Radford. I get he's going through somethings because his wife has been dead for four years, but that still doesn't change the fact he's stalking his kids. I'm not joking he's using government surveillance tech to spy on his pregnant daughter's eating habits even going as far as to use the fridge camera to see what's in there. Let me repeat myself, I'm not joking! Then there's the special effects. The Tripods' CGI isn't the worst CGI I've ever seen, but that still doesn't change the fact they're bad. The Tripods are PS3 levels of bad CGI. Then there's Ice Cube's acting. No matter how he talks even when he's supposed to be sincere he still sounds a little annoyed. It also doesn't help that some of his shock facial expressions can make for some good memes. I mean just look at this face.

Tell me that is not a good meme reaction when you want to be shocked in a sarcastic way 😆. Then we have the fact that the writers had no idea what they were talking about. Cause when it comes to data they were clearly clueless. Cause these aliens feed on our data yet the movie treats data like it's limited, when it actuality the aliens could feed on this for a lifetime. All they have to do is make copies of the same thing. Also according to this movie once GPS data is deleted (or as the movie weirdly puts it emptied) planes and jets will instantly stop flying and crash to the ground, and once DOD data is "emptied" the army will be powerless. Cause I guess in this movie's world even the guns need Wi-Fi 🤷🏻‍♂️😆? There's also some basic common knowledge aspects the writers should know. Like if a satellite is completely destroyed you're not gonna be able to get footage from it. Hell, the writers don't even know how to use a Trojan horse metaphor correctly and you don't have to be a tech geek understand that one you just have to get a basic understanding of the myth. And lastly this movie is a shameless whore for Amazon. One of the characters is an Amazon delivery employee, Amazon gift cards are mentioned three times, and at one point a drone from Amazon Prime Air is used as a plot device. I'm dead serious folks 😆.

The Okay: I've got nothing.

Final Verdict: So Bad, It's Good.

Well this edition wasn't a total waste. At least I got a good laugh out of War of the Worlds. But that's all for now. Come back on Thursday, Jul 30th, where I'll have something special planned to celebrate the upcoming MCU movie Spider-Man: Brand New Day. Until then, enjoy the rest of your day.

Pinocchio Unstrung Review

 

Well I once again dive into the world of the Twisted Childhood Universe. Let's say what was cooked up this time.

Pinocchio Unstrung is a independent slasher film and the fifth installment of the Twisted Childhood Universe, that acts a horror retelling of 1883 novel The Adventures of Pinocchio by Carlo Collodi. Jagged Edge Productions once again produced while Altitude Film Distribution was the distributor. Rhys Frake-Waterfield both wrote and directed.

The story is, after one James' friends died Geppetto creates Pinocchio so James can have a new friend in his life. It all seems fun, until Pinocchio starts killing people in order to protect James.

Initial Reaction

So I think you all know why I'm reviewing these movies. It's a form of morbid curiosity.

Cons

I've got nothing.

Middle Ground

The biggest mix is the writing. The writing for characters and overall plot will had into some familiar territory, so there's not exactly any new ground being broken here. There's also some humor that sometimes doesn't work. There was a good darkly funny moment involving gym equipment and a pretty funny video chat. But then sometimes a joke doesn't land. But I think the two things that saved the story was 1) I can't say it was boring or any other form of awful experience. And there's a couple of themes such as identity and grief going on. That's thematically ambition for this genre of horror flicks.

Pros

Now to get into the good stuff and there's plenty of it. For starters and this is the movie's biggest strength, the puppetry and other practical effects. This movie commits fully to its practical work and animatronics. It was really awesome and creepy to this horror version of Pinocchio move around because he's tangible and not some cheap CGI creation. I also gotta give credit to the kills. There very creative. There's the previously mentioned gym equipment and Pinocchio even uses his own puppet features to kill people with. The last thing I'll give credit to is shockingly enough the performances. Despite not being in the movie that long Robert Englund plays a delightful evil Cricket perfectly balancing menace and humor. Then there's Richard Brake who plays a really messed up version of Geppetto and anchors the movie with both grief and detachment. I also gotta praise Jude-Evan Lloyd as the voice of Pinocchio. He's a very young child actor but he did a really good at playing a very naive monster.

Pinocchio Unstrung isn't gonna end up on the top best films of 2026, but it's still a very entertaining watch. So if you're curious, give it a shot.

My final rating is, Good.

That's gonna wrap it up. Come back on Monday, Jul 27th, for part seven of Looking Back at the Films of 2025. Until then, enjoy the rest of your day.

Road to Avengers: Doomsday - Doctor Strange & Doctor Doom: Triumph & Torment Review

We're back once again to the Road to Avengers: Doomsday. Also once again we see Doctor Doom teaming up with a Marvel hero.

Doctor Strange & Doctor Doom: Triumph & Torment is a 1989 graphic novel that was published by Marvel Comics and can be found in issue forty-nine of Marvel Graphic Novel. The writer was Roger Stern and the artist was Mike Mignola (aka the creator of Hellboy).

The story is, Doctor Doom and Doctor Strange has entered a realm ruled by the sinister Mephisto, all in an effort to save a soul that means everything to Doom. But the questions are what price will be paid and is Doom willing to make the sacrifice?

• Negatives

I've got nothing.

• Mix

Let's keep it moving.

• Positives

One positive is the pacing. These may not be the quickest read but it's also not something that drags on and on. Pretty good for a graphic novel that's eighty pages long.

My other bit of praise goes to Mike Mignola's art. Now this was pre-Hellboy Mignola so maybe his style around this time wasn't noticeable during this point of his career. But regardless he does an incredible job. You get a gothic otherworldly visuals. Great use of heavy shadows, demonic realms, and a mystical atmosphere. And the colors provided by Mike Badger beautifully add to the moody feel.

The last aspect I'll praise is Roger Stern's writing. For Doctor Strange we see how he is kind of an opposite of Doom when it comes to his use of the mystical arts. But he's biggest story element is how he gets a different view of Doom even though he still feels the need to keep his guard up. But the best writing is for Doctor Doom. This story gives us more layers to his character by giving us more details to his backstory and motivations. We see him more humanized through his love and determination to save this trapped soul, however by the end he still isn't softened and redeemed. One of my favorite moment is Doom does save the soul, but it doesn't go the way I expected. I'd go into my details but they're spoils and I really don't want to give that moment away. It's just such a brilliant moment.

I loved this story! So far when it comes to Doctor Doom stories as of right now this is my number one.

My final rating is, A Must Read!

So first let me apologize for uploading this so late. But what was supposed to be a quick nap turned into something longer. Always make sure the alarm on your phone is actually turned on folks.

With that being said, come back on Saturday, Jul 25th, for the newest horror movie, Pinocchio Unstrung. Until then, enjoy the rest of your day.

A Look Back at Batman: Caped Crusader - Season 1

 

Season two will drop next week. So what better time then to review the first season.

Batman: Caped Crusader is an animated TV series based on DC Comics most popular character. Warner Bros. Animation, DC Entertainment, Bad Robot Productions, 6th & Idaho Motion Picture Company and Amazon MGM Studios produced with Amazon Prime Video distributing. The show is developed by Bruce Timm and this season consists of ten episodes.

The story is, the corrupt outnumber the good. Evil runs rampant and the innocent live in a constant state of fear. One of these innocents affected by these evils was Bruce Wayne. No longer wanting to just be the heir of the Wayne fortune, Bruce became not just someone else, but something else. He became the Batman and vowed a one man crusade for justice. But some of Batman's intentions will have unforseen consequences.

• Negatives

I've got nothing here.

• Mixed

The biggest mix element is the writing. Now plots aren't too bad. There really wasn't a moment where I found myself bored. I especially loved the fourth episode "The Night of the Hunters". That was a very exciting episode what with Flass and Bullock trying to lure Batman out, a building being on fire, and Batman trying to save lives while avoiding the police. That was a fun episode. I also loved episode two "...And Be a Villain". I wish I could go into more details for that one, but what I will say is I did like the villain's origin and motivate. It was a good spin on a classic Batman villain. But then you get into things that are more modern when this show is clearly in the 1940s. There's also a slight issue with character development. Batman does start off cold a bit but he does get a little bit of development throughout. But I think the one who got it the worse is Harvey Dent. We're meant to feel said when he becomes Two-Face, but he was already kind acting slimy before his face gets disfigured so he's turn to Two-Face doesn't have that small emotional pull it did in previous Batman media like Batman: The Animated Series or The Dark Knight.

My other slight problem is the animation. Now let me stress something out, the animation is pretty good. It works well. But there are moments when characters aren't as fluid as they should be and there were times when CGI was used, and when there's CG it can kinda clash with the show's art style.

• Positives

One pro is the voice acting. Initially I wasn't all that excited about Hamish Linklater as Bruce Wayne/Batman. But he did grow on me. He's performance is very strong and he does sound intimidating.

The last thing I'll praise is the tone. The show delivers on a strong and dark atmosphere. Gotham feels dangerous even when nothing is happening, and the show is very mature without going over the top.

Without a doubt the show has flaws. But there's still something to enjoy from it.

My final rating is, Good.

I'm hoping my slight criticisms won't pop up again in season two so fingers crossed. Anyways, that's all for now. Come back on Thursday, Jul 23rd, for another edition of the Road to Avengers: Doomsday. Until then, enjoy the rest of your day.

The Odyssey Review

 

Alright, after hearing so much controversy and drama surrounding this film, it's finally time for me to give my own thoughts on it.

The Odyssey is a fantasy action adventure film and it adapts Homer's epic poem of the same name. Syncopy produced along with Universal Pictures who were also the distributors. Christopher Nolan both wrote and directed.

The story is after fighting in the Trojan War, Odysseus and his men set sail on their way home. But this journey won't be easy as Odysseus comes across dangerous mythical beings all in an effort to get and reunite with his wife and the son who barely knows him.

Initial Reaction

Now originally I was excited for this film, so much so I put it on my list of most anticipated movies. But the closer and closer we got to this movie and more info was being released the less and less I was excited. But I still had hope that maybe, just maybe, Nolan would give us another win.

Cons

The only real problem I had was with the dialogue. Sometimes characters will talk like you'd expect people talk during ancient Greek times, but then next thing you know they talk in a very modern way. Why? I don't know. It's just a weird decision Nolan made.

Middle Ground

Let's get the biggest controversial thing out of the way. I am of course referring to the casting. I do admit some people are truly missed cast. The biggest example is Elliot Page. These are suppose to mighty Greek warriors, then you have Page who's what, 5 feet maybe 5'1? And might be 100 pounds when soaking wet? It's just when you see the cast try to play these characters sometimes you are taking out of the experience. But if even you can ignore casting decisions, how are the performances? Some like Matt Damon and Robert Pattinson are quite good. Pattinson does a great job at playing a guy who's very slimy, and Damon provides some really good layers with Odysseus being haunted by his hubris. Others are just fine. Nothing really to get upset about. The other slight issue was the pacing. Sometimes things move at a good rate. But there are moments where I was sitting and thinking "I'm starting to feel that nearly three hour runtime".

Pros

There are two good things about the movie. Firstly, Nolan's directing. While some shots didn't wow me, for at least 95% of the film there are some truly great shots. So while Nolan's writing for the movie wasn't all that exciting, I can't say the same for his directing. The last thing I'll praise is there are some truly great moments. One of the two was a sequence where Circe turns Odysseus' men into pigs and it looks like something out of a horror movie. Then there was also the third act. I would go into more details but it'll be too much of a spoiler. What I will say is that third act really did tie everything together.

Overall while I didn't truly hate this movie as much as I feared, I do gotta admit one thing. As far as Christopher Nolan films goes, this is by far his weakest. Which sucks to say as a Nolan fan because he's been killing since Memento, and I would've thought after Oppenheimer he would've delivered another truly great film. But sadly this is just decent at best.

My final rating is, Okay.

Yeah this something I don't feel like you have to rush to see. Just take your time. Well, that's all for now. Come back on Monday, Jul 20th, for my review of season one of Batman: Caped Crusader. Until then, enjoy the rest of your day.