Road to Street Fighter (2026) - Street Fighter: The Legend of Chun-Li Review

 

Well folks here we are. The last stop on the Road to Street Fighter (2026)! Sadly we end on a whimper and not a bang.

Street Fighter: The Legend of Chun-Li is a martial arts action film loosely based on the Street Fighter video games by Capcom. The movie also serves as a non-canonical spin-off and theatrical tin-in to 2008's Street Fighter IV. Hyde Park Entertainment along with Capcom & Adlabs Films produced while 20th Century Fox was the distributor. Andrzej Bartkowiak directed while Justin Marks wrote.

The story is, as a young girl Chun-Li's world was changed forever when her father was taken from her. Years later she receives a mysterious scroll that guides her to Bangkok. It's here she'll try to find her father while trying to put a stop an evil man named M. Bison.

• Negatives

There are so many problems with this. Starting with how generic it is. If you removed the Street Fighter elements, which this movie has little of, and replaced the title with something like "Path to Vengeance" you'd still have the same story. And I just realized this is now the second time I've said this about a video game movie. But I digress. The point is with or without the Street Fighter name or elements there's nothing about the movie's story that helps it standout. It doesn't do anything new in the action genre. It doesn't do anything new in the video game movie genre. It doesn't do anything new in the martial arts genre. It doesn't do anything new no matter what!

Speaking of those Street Fighter elements, can I mention how they don't fit for what this movie is going for. It has this gritty, grounded realistic tone and yet it has Chun-Li doing the Spinning Bird Kick and firing Haduokens. Those aren't realistic. So this movie has no idea what it wants to be? Gritty revenge story set in the real world or Street Fighter.

Then we have the dialogue. They really really needed to bring in another writer to clean up this dialogue because holy shit is it bad. Here's the movie's most infamous lines.

M. Bison: You see, your father has been the milk of my business. But even milk has an expiration date.

Yeah Bison, ya should've used a different beverage or diary product for your lifeblood metaphor. Milk is something that spoils the fastest. Also, "milk of my business"? I don't recall that ever being an expression. 😆

Then we have the acting. I don't know if the director doesn't understand how to director actors or if he was simply being lazy, either way the acting isn't good. Everyone ranges from flat, to bizarre, to stiff, to awkward. Michael Clarke Duncan and Neal McDonough are trying but they just can't. The material their given whether from the director or the writing is giving them nothing to work with.

The last thing I'll dismantle is how hardly anyone looks like their Street Fighter characters. Let me ask you question for any Street Fighter fan, especially the newer ones. Who is this guy supposed to be. 👇🏻

Go on, guess. Take your time I'm not gonna rush you. Don't know. Well I'm not gonna be too hard on you. Only people who watched the movie would've gotten the answer.

This guy is M. Bison. Yes. This guy is supposed be this guy.

Hate to state the obvious but you'll quickly notice that Legend of Chun-Li Bison is missing a few things. There's only one character who even comes close to his game counterpart and that's Vega. The other time is when Chun-Li went to some club I forget what it was, but when she was there she's wearing a blue dress and has her hair buns. But after that she's in regular street clothes. So basically Chun-Li's iconic dress is reduced to a cheap easter egg. Because of this I apologize to the '94 live-action movie. Granted some of the characters in that still don't look like their game counterparts. But at least there was an attempt!

• Mix

There's some decent fighting. Sometimes there's some quick cuts, but most of the time there's some decent fights.

• Positives

I'm not giving this movie any compliments because it doesn't deserve any.

This is just bad. Just plain bad. There's been plenty of terrible video game movies and this one ranks in the top ten.

My final rating is, Awful!

That's all for now. Fingers crossed the 2026 Street Fighter movie next month is at least decent 🤞🏻. But come back on Thursday, Sept 24th, for part nine of Looking Back at the Films of 2025. Until then, enjoy the rest of your day and avoid this movie whether you're a Street Fighter fan, film buff, or both.

Resident Evil (2026) Review

 

We got a brand new Resident Evil movie, but! Will this one be a winner and be far better than the Paul W.S. Anderson films & Welcome to Raccoon City? Or is just another failure?

Resident Evil is a horror movie based on the Capcom video game series of the same name. Production was done by Columbia Pictures, Constantin Film, Davis Films, Subconscious, Vertigo Entertainment along with Playstation Productions with Sony Pictures Releasing acting as the distributor. Zach Cregger directed and wrote the screenplay along with Shay Hatten.

The story is, a young medical courier named Bryan agreed to deliver one last and sensitive package to Racoon General Hospital in Raccoon City. On his way he accidentally hits a woman with his car and later finds her bloodied & catatonic. But this strange encounter will soon lead Bryan into a fight for survival when he encounters people turned into monsters because of an outbreak.

Initial Reaction

Originally I thought this could work. Mainly because Zach Cregger was in charged and he's made some really good movies. So all seems to be well...until the trailers and info was coming out. When I saw those trailers and read what Cregger was saying I quickly became highly skeptical of this movie. But I was gonna give it a chance.

Cons

This is gonna be controversial to say especially since this movie is getting so many great reviews but, I don't consider this a good Resident Evil movie. The horror elements which I'll get into later are good, but it's Resident Evil elements suck. The reason is because if you were to strip away the mentions of Racoon City, Umbrella Corporation, and retitle this something like "Infection", you'd still get the same exact movie. To me if you're gonna make a Resident Evil and use Racoon City and Umbrella Corporation then they need to be consistent throughout the movie and not just throwaway lines. And I know people are gonna say two things and then some to defend this flick. 1) There's been other games that don't use Racoon City and take place in different parts of the world. That's true, but this movie used Racoon City as part of its plot so you'd think they'd make it a bigger deal that Bryan is going there. Especially since if I remember  correctly this movie takes place somewhere during Resident Evil 2. 2) Cregger said he was giving you the "feeling" of playing a Resident Evil game. Okay...and?! He could've made the audience and fans have the feeling of playing a Resident Evil game while still having the story ACTUALLY be Resident Evil. The experience of playing the games is only one ingredient out of many.

Middle Ground

My only mixed feelings on the movie was the humor. I'll admit there were a couple times I laughed, but there was also moments that didn't need humor. I get Cregger was a founding member of The Whitest Kids U' Know so I should've expected much, but I still feel as though some stuff could've been cut out. Which is funny for me to say because Cregger did cut out a lot of comedic bits.

Pros

One thing I'll praise is the pacing. This movie goes by at a great pace. Yesterday when I saw this I got to the theater for an early showing and by the time it was done not only did I feel like I wasn't in the theater that but I still had plenty of time to get some lunch 😆. Another thing I'll credit is the scares. Granted not everything scared me, but there were quite a lot of moments that freaked me out. Like when infected mice came out of a guy's stomach. That was disturbing and gross. The last aspect of the movie I'll say is good is Austin Abrams' performance. Regardless of fans feel about this movie I'd like to think we can agree that Abrams carries the movie. He does a tremendous job at showcasing an ordinary guy thrown into an increasingly deadly scenario. One of my favorite scenes is when he breaks down and records a message to his pregnant girlfriend and regrets his reaction to the news about her being pregnant. That was an amazing moment done perfectly by Austin Abrams.

Overall while there are some enjoyable things in this movie, but at the end of the day this is a Resident Evil film in name only.

My final rating is, a very low Okay.

If you are or were curious about seeing this movie then just wait for it to come to a streaming service. That's all for now. Come back on Monday, Sept 21st, for the last part of my Road to Street Fighter (2026). Until then, enjoy the rest of your day.

The Transformers: The Movie Review

 

Back when Transformers One was released it wasn't until a couple days later I realized I missed a huge opportunity to review this prior to Transformers One coming out. But apparently that was a blessing in disguise because the good folks at Hasbro decided to celebrate this movie's 40th anniversary but re-releasing it to theaters. Although I'm little bummed out because that big Fathom event will include new footage but I sadly won't be able to see it because that event isn't close by. Oh well, I can still celebrate the 40th anniversary by reviewing this anyways.

The Transformers: The Movie is an animated sci-fi action film based on the Transformers TV series and acts as a bridge between the show's second and third seasons. Production was done by Sunbow Productions, Marvel Productions (and yes, that is connected to Marvel Comics. This was an old production studio of theirs), and Toei Animation with De Laurentiis Entertainment acting as distributor. Nelson Shin directed while both Ron Friedman and Flint Dille wrote the screenplay. So if any of you 80's kids want to blame someone for traumatizing you those are the writers to go after. 😆

The story is, it's the year 2005, twenty-years after the second season of the show. The Decepticons have conquered the planet Cybertron but their leader Megatron still wants to kill all Autobots. His plan to invade Autobot City will lead to one final fight between him and Optimus Prime. But while this war is going on something far more evil is in space devouring entire planets. This evil is known as Unicron, and he has his sights set on destroying the one thing that can kill him, the Matrix of Leadership.

• Negatives

I've got nothing.

• Mix

The first slight issue is the tone. Now I liked that the filmmakers took the risk of making things a very dark compared to show's lighter tone. With the darker tone they were able to take risk and do more serious stuff with the material. You get that very serious vibe with moments like the opening Unicron scene, the battle at Autobot City, and the deaths. Oh boy the deaths. This was actually my second time watching and I was still shocked by how many characters straight up die in this. It's no wonder kids in the 80's were shocked and traumatized 😆. Poor kids thought they were in for a fun movie next thing they know they had to see their favorite Transformer die because they didn't buy enough of their toys. But with all that said sometimes the movie will give you tonal whiplash. One moment we'll see something brutal then the next moment the Autobots are dancing while Weird Al's Dare to be Stupid is playing in the background. No, for real, that last part actually happens. It's by far the weirdest part of the entire movie.

Then there's the animation quality. For the most part the animation is really good. Transformation sequences can have a fluid movements and there's lots of time when it feels like an anime. Although the latter shouldn't be too surprising considering Toei Animation was involved. But there are moments where characters can be very stiff.

• Positives

One praise I'll give is the pacing. Now if you know me then you know I'm not a full blown hater of the Michael Bay Transformers movies, but I do admit a lot of them have some slight pacing issues. Not the case here. This movie is a breeze to get through.

Then we have the music. Vince DiCola's score is pretty good. I especially loved the music when one of the major Autobots died. DiCola's score really set the tragic mood for that scene. But then we have the songs. You got the main staple song that being "The Touch" by Stan Bush, but my personal favorite is "Instruments of Destruction" by NRG. Sure the music is 80's as all hell but I think that adds to the movie's charm.

The last thing I'll credit is the voice acting. Peter Cullen despite his limited time as Optimus Prime still delivered, especially since this time around he was playing it straight so you get to hear more of a serious tone in his work. Then you have newcomers like Judd Nelson (if that name sounds familiar it's because he plays John Bender in The Breakfast Club) who brings out Hot Rod's youthful energy, swagger, and eventual growth. Robert Stack (probably best known to some as the later host of Unsolved Mysteries) gives a stiff, military authority, and slightly formal voice for Ultra Magnus. Which is perfect for that character because he's a good soldier but an imperfect leader. Leonard Nimoy gives Galvatron a colder, calculated menace, and a slightly contained madness. Lastly Orson Welles (best known for the ever classic Citizen Kane), in his final film role before he sadly passed away, was amazing as Unicron. He brings out Unicron as an ancient and terrifying destructive god. And the best part of his performance is Unicron sounds indifferent rather than a cartoonish villain.

This was a fun movie to watch. I think even with those slight flaws your experience watching the movie isn't gonna be ruined. I think the better aspects slightly help, just slightly.

My final rating is, Good.

Now you can come back on Saturday, Sept 19th, for my review of Zack Cregger's Resident Evil, but right now I want to be serious for a moment.

So as all of you Transformer fans know, on August 27th, news broke that Peter Cullen the voice of Optimus Prime had passed away.

It's sad to hear such a talented man is gone but worse than that it's sad to know a great man and a hero to many is no longer with us.

There's a quote at the end of Transformers: Age of Extinction that Optimus Prime said that's always been stuck in my head. This quote is now even more special and hits hard given Cullen's passing.

It goes, "Whenever you look to the stars, think of one of them as my soul."

I don't think I have the right to speak for every single fan, but we'll be doing just that Peter Cullen.

Rest in Peace.

Fan Film Mondays - Logan the Wolf Review

 

Alright! Another edition of my newest segment. Let's see what today's fan film has in store.

Logan the Wolf is a 2024 fan film that's based on the fan favorite Marvel Comics' character of Wolverine. The short film was directed by Godefroy Ryckewaert who also wrote the story with Maxime Ecoiffier (who also plays Logan). They uploaded the short on YouTube.

The story is, Logan has a bounty placed on his head. A group of hunters have found him and Logan at first keeps the beast inside but once that's no longer an option, he'll unleash a fury upon these hunters. One they've never seen before.

• Negatives

I've got nothing.

• Mix

I'm gonna be fully honest. It's the story. It's very basic and thin. Here's how it goes. Bounty hunters are looking and find Logan, Logan gives them a warning, they don't listen, and then they fight fight fight. That's basically the movie. But I don't think it's a bad thing. They made this in only five days. So I imagine this was just a fun little project that a group of friends made just because they thought it'd be fun to do. And guess what? It is indeed fun. We get to see an alternate version of Wolverine (in this case a Viking version) just mess people up. So if anything this is a popcorn flick and it's one that delivers.

• Positives

One praise I'll give is the concept. It's simple but a very enjoyable simple. It's Wolverine but as a viking. That's just badass. But what made this premise so entertaining was there was a clear as day passion when making this. The directing and action should half of that passion, but so did the costumes and cinematography. Everything from wolf motifs to pelts to the forest setting and makeup show Ryckewaert and his crew put in the work.

The last thing I'll is the action. The action is awesome! Whether it's swords and axes clashing or Wolverine's claws tearing people up it's a thrill to watch. The main fight between Logan and the bounty hunters is fantastic bloody brawl that's right up there with the bloody intensity of official Wolverine films such as Logan and Deadpool & Wolverine.

While storytelling is pretty basic I still say you should give this watch. It's a blast. And it's very short too. It only 11 minutes long and it goes by quickly. And I strongly recommend you watch the full 11 minutes because there's some surprises at the end.

My final rating is, Good.

That's all for now. If you want to watch this then click here. Due come back on Thursday, Sept 17th, where I'll review The Transformers: The Movie. All in celebration of the movie's 40th anniversary. Until then, enjoy the rest of your day.

The Uprising Review

 

So Paul Greengrass famous for the Bourne films is out with a new movie. The biggest question is, is it any good?

The Uprising is an action period drama that's produced by Thank You Pictures and Supernix with Focus Features acting as the distributor. The movie is written and directed by Paul Greengrass.

The story is, it's 1381 and England has yet to recover from the Black Death that killed half the population. To make matters worse King Richard II is only 14 years old making him far too young to rule and he's also far too disturbed because he has nightmares of mobs of demons. When he levies a harsh new poll tax, a young grieving farmer known as the "Ploughman" rallies his fellow exhausted commoners to rebel against their tyrannical ruler.

Initial Reaction

Originally I had no plans to see this movie. But once I saw Greengrass was not only directing but Andrew Garfield (who might I add should have that third Amazing Spider-Man movie) was starring, I decided to give it a watch then give my thoughts.

Cons

I've got nothing.

Middle Ground

One gray area is Greengrass' directing. Now Paul Greengrass is a very good director. He's made some truly good movies such as the previously mentioned Bourne films, United 93, Captain Phillips (which I absolutely loved by the way), and last year's The Lost Bus. Having said that this is one the few times when I wasn't fully feeling his style. I think this is one of those instances where he should've toned down the shaky-cam. Usually I don't mind it too much as long as it's used well, but here it can get a little tiring. There was also the pacing in the middle section of the movie. Pacing during the beginning and ending not too bad. The middle however felt very stretched out. Lastly there's character. Characters such as John Ball and Wat Tyler are pretty good. With Ball we have a preacher with an energy pushing egalitarian ideas. With Tyler we have former soldier bringing a battle-hardened presence. So both have something interesting even though they're pushed to the side most of the time. Then we have King Richard II. He goes from a weak young teen to a more ruthless man with a colder personality. But what about Ploughman you might be asking? Well, he's just more straightforward. Which isn't necessarily a bad thing, but I felt like if Ploughman wasn't mute for most of the time and actually spoke more than we could've gone deeper into his character and motivations.

Pros

Now there's quite a few good things about The Uprising. One of them is the tone. I've heard people complain about the "bleak tone" which is stupid. For crying out loud people the film takes place after a plague nearly wiped out humanity. Nobody's gonna be singing Kumbaya. But I digress. The tone is great because it doesn't romanticize the Peasants' Revolt. Greengrass made the right decision showing us just how brutal and intense this revolt was or supposedly was. I also want to quickly praise Pål Ulvik Rokseth's cinematography. His gloomy style also helped sell just how harsh this atmosphere is. The last thing I'll praise is Andrew Garfield's performance. Despite his character needing more work done, Garfield does a tremendous job with the limited material he had to work. Even though he had to be wordless for a lot of the movie, you can still see and feel the trauma and fury Garfield displays through facial expressions and body language.

Originally I went into this with high expectations and I left not disappointed but more of a feeling of "that was alright."

My final rating is, Okay.

That's gonna wrap things up. Come back on Monday, Sept 14th, for a brand new Fan Film Mondays! For that one I'll be reviewing a Wolverine fan film. Until then, enjoy the rest of your day.

Road to Ice Age: Boiling Point - Ice Age: The Meltdown Review

 

Tuesday I returned to the Road to Avengers: Doomsday. Today I return to this road.

Ice Age: The Meltdown is an animated adventures comedy that's produced by 20th Century Animation and Blue Sky Studios while 20th Century Fox is the distributor. The movie is the sequel to Ice Age thus making this the second entry to the film series. Carlos Saldanha directed while Peter Gaulke, Gerry Swallow, and Jim Hecht wrote the story.

Speaking of story, sometime after the events of the first film our unlikely trio of Manny, Diego, and Sid are living in a valley along with other mammals. But this peaceful time comes to an end when what the mammals thought was a high ice wall is actually dam and it's barely holding a reservoir. Everyone has three days to get to the other end of the valley and hop on a boat before the flood comes in. During this journey, Manny starts to believe he's the last of his kind until his meets a female mammoth named Ellie and there could possibly be love in the air.

• Negatives

The biggest letdown is our villains of Cretaceous and Maelstrom. Their lack of screen time really hurt them. First they get a very strong introduction, then they attack "The Herd", but then they're gone for a majority of the film and don't show up again until the climax. Because of this structure it's almost easy to forget they're in the movie. Yes, our heroes avoided water as much as they could to avoid them, but the filmmakers still could've given us more. Just so us smaller scenes of them prowling the rising waters or even taking out more background characters. Doing that would've made them even more threatening than feeling like an afterthought.

• Mix

It comes down to the tone. This one is more comedic and action oriented compared to the more quieter first film. Now being both more comedic and action-packed isn't a bad thing it could even help the movie and I did enjoy some of those elements. However I also felt like those elements were more focused on then character development.

• Positives

One positive was the humor. I know I said I was mixed on the tone but there were some comedic moments I found funny. One of my favorites is when "The Lone Gunslinger Vulture" was talking about the good news of the flood. The good news being the more of them die they better he eats, then all of the mammals are just shocked and appalled by what he said and his response is "I didn't say it was good news for you". That was just a great & dark bait and switch moment. 😆

Another good element is the voice acting. Ray Romano, Denis Leary, and John Leguizamo once again provide some fun chemistry both in a serious and comedic sense. And Queen Latifah (plays Ellie) along with the other newest cast members of Seann William Scott (playing Crash) and Josh Peck (playing Eddie) were actually fun additions to the cast as suppose to annoyances like some sequel characters can fall into.

The last thing I'll praise is the animation. The first film's animation was good and things move took some of those aspects and improved them. Characters look sharper and have more movement to them. Meanwhile melting landscapes and flood sequences have great momentum to them.

Ice Age: The Meltdown has its flaws but it's definitely the strongest out of the many sequels.

My final rating is, Okay.

That's gonna do it for me. Come back on Saturday, Sept 12th, for my review of the newest Andrew Garfield movie, The Uprising. Until then, enjoy the rest of your day.

Road to Avengers: Doomsday - Books of Doom Review

Alright folks before we get started, let me explain something. For any of you who read my Mayday post let me just say I'm doing much better than when I uploaded that. So without any further ado, can you believe we're almost at the end of this Road to Avengers: Doomsday? It felt like I only started doing this a couple of weeks ago then months ago.

Books of Doom is a 2005-2006 six issues miniseries published by Marvel Comics. It was written by one of my many favorite writers Ed Brubaker and every issue was drawn by Pablo Raimondi.

The story is, Doctor Doom is recounting his life story to a journalist. About how he rose up from childhood tragedy to the great ruler of Latveria the world sees today. But, the true story might not be exactly as how Doom is telling it.

• Negatives

I've got nothing.

• Mix

Got nothing here either.

• Positives

One positive is the pacing. Not only are these quick reads, but if you ever read the collected edition that flow is even better because it's far more continuous. What also helped with the pacing is each issue pretty much a self-contained story. So if you finish issue one it won't feel like you absolutely need to read issue two because the story felt like it's on pause for the next part.

My next praise goes to Raimondi's art. I wasn't aware of Raimondi's work until I read this and I l liked what he did. His figure work is strong, his expressions on the faces are really good, and his details from settings to time periods to Doom's armor all get a thumbs up.

The last thing I'll praise is Ed Brubaker's writing. Firstly, we've seen Doctor Doom's origin explored before in comics one being Fantastic Four (1961) Annual #2, but you don't have to read that to understand this story. If you're a new reader you can just jump right into this with no prior knowledge to other Doctor Doom stories. But what I especially loved was how Brubaker framed this story. Because Doom has either the biggest or top five biggest egos in the Marvel Universe, Doom is an unreliable narrator. This was a smart because much while stories like Interlude gave us a glimpse, this comic goes even deeper into Doom's arrogance, self-justification, convince of his own superiority, and just how much he views himself as the hero. He quite literally twists events to make sure his image isn't destroyed. One example was in the first issue where during a funeral for a family member he lost at a young age, there's people not saying the nicest things about the deceased and Doom says he gave a speech that brought them back to their senses, back to the light. When in actuality he threatened them. And that's only one example of his grandiose delusions.

I strongly recommend you read this before seeing Avengers: Doomsday. It's not only a great dive into Doom's origin but a great dive into Doom's mind.

My final rating is, A Must Read!

So that's all for now. Sorry for posting this pretty late but...I really wanted to watch the newest episode of Dark Side of the Cage 😅. But anyhow, come back on Thursday, Sept 10th, for when I do part two of the Road to Ice Age: Boiling Point. Until then, enjoy the rest of your day.